Concerns are raised regarding novel screening diagnostics tests in BMJ article

24

Jul 2017

There are two principle ways of applying diagnostic test: for confirmation of diagnosis in person with symptoms (confirmatory test) and to detect disease in otherwise healthy individual with no symptoms (screening test). As burden of false positive results is much bigger in screening application of the test, screening tests are subject for more regulated market entry in many European countries.

In the recent article “New diagnostic tests: more harm than good” Hofmann and Gilbert explored potential value of four novel diagnostic tests for clinicians: immunosignature for cancer and infections, breath test for lung cancer, patch vital sign monitoring and biomarkers for Alzheimer’s disease.

For each test researchers raised common concerns for screening tests:

  • High rate of false positive results and understated rate of false positive results
  • Consequences of results of early testing for person’s insurance and employment
  • Downstream cost of further testing and treatment
  • Rapid increase in prevalence of disease
  • Identification of people with mainly mild conditions

Researches also reference interesting phenomena of potentially misleading feedback to application of diagnostic tests. Thus, at populational level earlier diagnosed people in milder condition would be more satisfied compared with people diagnosed at later stage of disease with more severe condition. At individual level people are generally reassured by [negative] results of testing. So, authors are arguing that the feedback from public and patients can be misleading for policy decision making.

As the measures to counterbalance rapid introduction of novel tests with potential harms researchers suggest:

  • Bundling cost of subsequent testing into cost of the test itself
  • Rigorous approval process (where exists)
  • Shared decision making
  • Respect baseline risk – focus on higher risk individuals
  • Think downstream – how results of the test would change clinical management of patient?

Read full article here.

Subscribe to our newsletter delivered every second week not to miss important reimbursement information.

The latest related news

18

Mar 2022

On February 22, 2022, a repository of innovative acts outside the nomenclature of biology and anatomopathology (RIHN) and a Supplementary list of IVD tests were published. Minor changes were introduced in the 2022 RIHN list.

Read more

25

Feb 2022

The Council for Choices in Health Care in Finland (PALKO) has discontinued the development of recommendations concerning companion diagnostic tests. The respective preparations were completed in November 2021.

Read more

23

Feb 2022

On January 24, 2022, the Norwegian Directorate of e-Health released an updated version of the National Laboratory code (NLK) system and associated tariffs for state and private laboratories to be implemented no later than March 01, 2022. NLK system has been used for activity-based reimbursement by the Norwegian Health Economics Administration (Helfo) in outpatient settings since 2018. Thirty new codes were added medical biochemistry, medical microbiology, immunology and transfusiology, and clinical pharmacology areas.

Read more

07

Jan 2022

In late December 2021, five new in-vitro diagnostics tests, including one test for COVID-19 spike protein antibodies determination, were added to the Laboratory Test Nomenclature (Laboratoriotutkimusnimikkeistö) in Finland.

Read more

30

Dec 2021

The Council for Choices in Health Care in Finland (PALKO) has initiated the development of recommendations concerning companion diagnostic tests. The respective preparations were completed in November 2021.

Read more