NICE will release new technology assessment of TAVI in July 2017

04

Apr 2017

NICE in the UK has released a consultation document in relation to the TAVI procedure (Interventional Procedure Guidance).

Publication of the final guidance, which will replace the guidance from the 2012, is expected in July 2017. In 2012 evidence for inoperable patients was considered adequate.

The following recommendations were made in the current (from 2012) IPG for TAVI:

  • "Evidence on the safety of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) for aortic stenosis shows the potential for serious but well-recognised complications
  • For patients with aortic stenosis who are considered to be unsuitable for surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR; see sections 1.6 and 2.1.3) the evidence on the efficacy of TAVI is adequate. For these patients, TAVI may be used with normal arrangements for clinical governance, consent and audit. Details of all patients should be entered into the UK Central Cardiac Audit Database.
  • For patients with aortic stenosis for whom SAVR is considered suitable but to pose a high risk (see sections 1.5, 1.6 and 2.1.3) the evidence on the efficacy of TAVI is inadequate. For these patients TAVI should only be used with special arrangements for clinical governance, consent and data collection or research. NICE encourages clinicians to enter suitable patients into the UK TAVI trial. In addition, details of all patients should be entered into the UK Central Cardiac Audit Database.
  • For patients with aortic stenosis for whom SAVR is considered suitable and not to pose a high risk (see sections 1.6 and 2.1.3) the evidence on the efficacy of TAVI is inadequate. For these patients TAVI should only be used in the context of research. NICE encourages clinicians to enter suitable patients into the UK TAVI trial. In addition, details of all patients should be entered into the UK Central Cardiac Audit Database."

Consultation document includes information about considered evidence of efficacy and safety, although the interpretation of evidence by the Interventional Procedures Advisory Committee is not clear at the moment. 

The most interesting development is in relation to the operable high and intermediate risk patient groups.

Access the consultation documents here.

The latest related news

24

Mar 2022

The HTA body of the Tuscany Regional Healthcare issues two types of documents: HTA forms and motivational forms. With a regional decree 2472 of February 10, 2022, Tuscany Regional Healthcare has published assessments of five medical devices of various therapeutic areas, such as cardiovascular and peripheral vascular areas.

Read more

21

Mar 2022

The NHS Insights Prioritisation Programme (NIPP) is commissioned by the NHS Accelerated Access Collaborative (AAC) and the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR). It is designed to accelerate the evaluation and implementation of innovation that supports post-pandemic ways of working, builds service resilience, and delivers benefits to patients. Fourteen projects have been funded and have now commenced activity that will be ongoing until March 2023.

Read more

15

Mar 2022

The Belgian Health Care Knowledge Center (KCE) initiated a study aimed at defining a clear and transparent procedure for the evaluation of digital health technologies in Belgium.

Read more

14

Mar 2022

In February 2021, the Clinical Coding and Schedule Development (CCSD) working group, which develops and maintains procedural and diagnostics nomenclature for private payers in England, published Bulletins 0182 and 0079 with changes to be implemented no later than April 10, 2022. Three new procedure codes concerned robotic surgery in orthopaedic area, spinal procedures, and ophthalmology, and five new diagnostic codes were introduced.

Read more

11

Mar 2022

On February 07, 2022, the Dental and Pharmaceutical Benefits Agency has announced the withdrawal of the assessments of the PhysioMem PM 100 and CardioMem CM 100 XT and the finalization of the assessments of the Zenicor ECG, Coala Heart Monitor Pro, and KardiaMobile. For the conducted assessments, it was outlined that the portable devices provide more limited information than standard ECG measurements; therefore, it was mainly estimated for atrial fibrillation.

Read more